Party Unity in Parliamentary Democracies: A Comparative Analysis
نویسنده
چکیده
The level and causes of party unity are under researched topics in parliamentary democracies, particularly in comparative perspective. This article presents a non formal model explaining party unity in legislative voting as the result of individual legislators’ decisions reacting to the incentives and constraints created by their respective institutional environments. Hypotheses derived from the model are tested against empirical data on party unity in 11 western parliamentary democracies since 1945. On the system level, central party control over nominations and intra parliamentary resources as well as the strength of parliamentary committees with regard to policy decisions are shown to affect party unity as expected by the model. On the level of individual parties, governing parties are less unified than opposition parties and larger parties show higher unity than smaller ones. Both results shed doubt on frequent claims in the literature.
منابع مشابه
Modelling Cabinet Networks in Parliamentary Democracies
Parliamentary democracies represent a common type of governance structure in numerous countries. While details vary from one country to another, the structure of a parliamentary democracy entails having cabinet ministers who each have a specific portfolio of policy interests, such as healthcare, industry, or education. A set of ministers forms a government, and such governments can change due t...
متن کاملThe imperial vision of Halford Mackinder
From 1899 to 1939, Halford Mackinder was active in imperial affairs. In 1899, the same year he climbed Mount Kenya, he set out the case for free trade. Rapidly he converted to imperial protectionism, left the Liberal Party and joined the Conservatives. Mackinder, along with his associates in the Conservative Party, Leo Amery and Lord Milner, promoted the cause of imperial unity and imperial pre...
متن کاملComparative Politics with Endogenous Intra-Party Discipline1
Party discipline is known to be di¤erent in Parliamentary and in Presidential democracies. Yet, the theoretical literature is silent about why parties adopt such di¤erent structures. We propose a setup where parties are brands. They strategically choose both their ideological position and their internal discipline. The latter introduces a trade-o¤ between the informativeness of the party label ...
متن کاملCritical analysis of the President's Authorization in the Turkish's 2017 Constitution
From the time that it took political authority in Turkey, the AKP constantly raised the issue of changing Turkey's political system from the parliamentary to the presidential system. Under Erdogan's leadership, after the coup in April 15, 2016, the party was able to reach its goal thanks to the political support of parties and social accompaniment through 2017's referendum. The purpose of this ...
متن کاملParties in Government: Incumbency and Representation in Parliamentary Democracies
[150 words] In spite of electoral change since the 1990s, party composition of government changes less and established parties stay in office longer than others regardless their electoral fortunes. This development is conducive to incongruence between the changing pattern of parties represented in parliament and those getting into government. It is argued that office seeking behaviour has becom...
متن کامل